Go Global. But Not Without Political Clout

Related entries: Business Issues, Corporate News, General, Investment, Services, Strategy

Lobbyists (or “public affairs” / “government communications”) consultants have long been a feature on the business map in China, and it seems that globalizing Chinese businesses have taken note. Caijing magazine reports that an increasing number of Chinese companies are hiring lobbyists when they go global. Examples include:

    • Lenovo have hired Jeffrey Carlisle as VP for US government relations, the “first-ever in-house lobbyist for a Chinese company in the United States”. He was formerly an official at the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC).

    • Bank of China hired Public Strategies inc. ahead of its pre-IPO US road-show (at a reported cost of US$85,000 a month).

    • The City of Beijing hired PR firm Hill & Knowlton in May, on a three-year contract, to promote the 2008 Olympics.

It is not surprising that Chinese companies are making these moves. They are seeking global market access, are learning “on the job”, and need to compete with locals, the local way – much as foreign companies have had to do in China.

The challenges they face are very real, and political opposition to CNOOC’s bid for Unocal’s, and Lenovo’s contested contract to supply computers to US government offices are just two examples. In the CNOOC case, Caijing reports that the company:

    “spent US$ 3 million to hire a 96-member team from Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP to pave the way for the acquisition…. Despite the firm’s considerable manpower, CNOOC ultimately lost its bid, not least because of the anti-China sentiments of several congressmen.”

Another problem was that CNOOC did not lay the groundwork, and build support, before making the bid. Instead they simply reacted to – but could not contain – the outcry. Don’t expect the same mistake to be made again:

    “Fu Changyu, the chairman of CNOOC…told The Wall Street Journal last month that the most valuable lesson he learned from the failed bid was that public relations and political lobbying should precede formal moves for acquisition.”

Making products cheaply in China is no longer enough to succeed and, in today’s politically-charged environment, market access cannot always be bought on economic arguments. If Chinese companies want to “go global”, they will find that value-added services, such as lobbying and PR, are among the few sectors where competitive advantage can still be found overseas.

China Lobby Curries Favor With U.S. Government
Caijing

3 Responses to “Go Global. But Not Without Political Clout”

  1. Archive » China’s “Go Global” Spending Spree| China Business Blog Says:

    […] due to nationalistic protectionism (and specifically the risk of natinoalisation). We have seen it all before in the US. And we will see it again elsewhere. See news sources: China buy […]

  2. Archive » China ODI Update| China Business Blog Says:

    […] with more talk of minority stakes, use of foreign fund managers, and passive investments, they may have been) we may see a lot more Chinese money going overseas, and more Chinese firms i […]

  3. Archive » Protectionist Duty? | China Business Blog Says:

    […] Four”, and China’s regulatory blocking of Hummer’s purchase by Tengzhong (something that China knows all about from its US / Unocal experience), the air around trade talks is far from clear, and some companies […]

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.